travel deductions

Travel deductions to and from rental premises no longer allowed

If you own residential premises that you rent out, you should be aware that you may no longer be able to claim travel deductions connected with trips you make to and from those premises.

Travel expenditure incurred on or after 1 July 2017 in connection with residential premises from which you earn rent or other assessable income will not be deductible (subject to certain exceptions – see below). This includes expenses for travel undertaken to, for example, collect rent, inspect, or maintain the premises.

The measure was originally announced in May as part of the 2017–2018 Federal Budget. We now have legislation that will implement this.

“Travel expenditure includes motor vehicle expenses, taxi or hire car costs, airfares, public transport costs, and any meals or accommodation related to the travel”

Some workplaces require their staff to wear a uniform. Or if you’re a tradie, you will be required to wear steel capped boots, heavy duty protective clothing and other items. You could claim:

  • Uniform
  • Laundry
  • Protective shoes or non-slip shoes
  • Safety equipment and protective clothing
  • Sunglasses and sunscreen.

It does not matter where the residential premises are located. For example, if you travel by car to mow the lawn of a house you rent out, you will not be able to deduct those car expenses. Similarly, if you fly interstate for a couple of days to inspect an apartment you rent out and you stay in a hotel, you will not be able to claim a deduction for your flights, hotel, meals and taxis (eg, to and from the airport or from the hotel to the apartment).

There are a number of exceptions to this, which are as follows:

  • if the expenditure is incurred in carrying on a business (eg, if you own many residential rental premises and you are treated as carrying on a business);

  • if the expenditure is incurred by a company;

  • if the expenditure is incurred by a managed investment trust or a public unit trust;

  • if the expenditure is incurred by a superannuation fund – but this exception does not apply if the fund is a self-managed fund (SMSF), so travel expenditure incurred by an SMSF will not be deductible.

If the residential rental premises are owned by a partnership, the travel expenditure will not be deductible unless all members of the partnership are one of the excluded entities listed above – ie, a company, managed investment trust, public unit trust or superannuation fund that is not an SMSF.

You should also be aware that any travel expenditure that is not deductible will be ignored in working out your capital gain (or loss) should you sell the premises – in other words, the expenditure cannot reduce the capital gain (or increase the loss).

The changes will not prevent you from engaging third parties such as real estate agents to provide property management services for an investment property. These expenses will remain deductible.

Other restrictions

There are two other related measures that were announced in the Federal Budget:

  • limiting depreciation deductions for second-hand depreciating assets used or installed in residential rental premises; and

  • imposing an annual vacancy fee on foreign owners of residential property that is not occupied or genuinely available for rent for at least six months in a 12-month period.

Do you rent out residential premises?

If you rent out residential property that you own, please contact our office for further information on what is deductible from the tax you may owe.

Money Saving

Super guarantee: are you ready for ATO crack down?

The ATO is increasing its efforts to crack down on employers who fail to make quarterly superannuation guarantee (SG) contributions of 9.5% on behalf of their employees. If you are an employer, regardless of whether you run a small or large business, now might be a good time to review your SG obligations before the ATO comes knocking. If a shortfall is discovered, simply rushing to make extra super contributions will not always be the best course of action. In fact, it can result in a double liability, so careful planning is required for dealing with any identified problems.

It is estimated that the shortfall – or gap – in SG payments could be around 5.2%, equivalent to $2.85 billion in missing super contributions (based on estimated figures for 2014–15). This gap is the difference between the theoretical amount due by employers to be fully compliant with their SG obligations and the actual contributions received by super funds. The Minister for Revenue said the failure of some employers to meet their SG obligations to employees has been a problem ever since SG was introduced in 1992.

ATO Deputy Commissioner, James O’Halloran reported recently: “While this analysis shows that 95% of the estimated superannuation guarantee is paid to employees, the gap exists because some employers appear not to be meeting their super guarantee obligations either by not paying enough or not paying it at all”. This follows recent pressure from a Senate Committee calling for the ATO to adopt stronger compliance activities, rather than its previous reactive approach.

In addition to following up all reports of unpaid SG, the ATO says it is increasing its proactive SG case work by a third this financial year. Mr O’Halloran added:

“We have improved our analysis of data to detect patterns in non-payment, and are working more closely with other government agencies to exchange information”

Package of reforms

As if the Commissioner doesn’t have enough powers already, the Government has announced a package of reforms to give the ATO real-time visibility over SG compliance by employers. One of these involves additional ATO funding for a Superannuation Guarantee Taskforce to crack down on non-compliant employers.

Other key recommendations include the following:

Monthly contribution reporting

Superannuation funds will be required to report to the ATO on contributions received more frequently, at least monthly. The Government says this will enable the ATO to identify non-compliance and take prompt action. It has been noted that this move to more regular SG reporting will place a greater cost burden on super funds, especially smaller ones.

Single Touch Payroll (STP) roll out

Employers with 20 or more employees will transition to STP from 1 July 2018, while smaller employers (ie, those with 19 or less employees) will move to STP from 1 July 2019. Rather than being a check on businesses, this new system is designed to reduce the regulatory burden and transform compliance.

Director penalty notices

The issue of director penalty notices and the use of security bonds for high-risk employers are measures set to improve the effectiveness of the ATO’s recovery powers, to ensure that unpaid superannuation is collected and paid to employees’ super accounts.

Penalties by court order

The ATO will have the ability to seek court-ordered penalties in the most serious cases of non-payment, including those employers who are repeatedly caught but still fail to pay SG liabilities.

 Super contribution due dates

Quarter ending          Employer contribution           Late contributions,

                                               due date                         SGC statement and

                                                                                         payment due date

           30 September                   28 October                            28 November

           31 December                    28 January                             28 February

           31 March                           28 April                                  28 May

           30 June                               28 July                                    28 August

Employers are required to make quarterly super contributions of at least 9.5% of an employee’s ordinary time earnings. If the super fund receives the SG contributions by the quarterly due dates (see table) the contribution is tax-deductible for the employer, whereas a late payment is not tax-deductible.

Where an employer does not make sufficient quarterly super contributions by the due date, the employer becomes liable for the superannuation guarantee charge (SGC). The SGC is payable to the ATO and automatically arises as soon as the contributions are not made by the due date. This means that if an employer discovers a shortfall in SG contributions after the due date, making a contribution to the employee’s super fund to cover the shortfall isn’t always the best course of action as it may not reduce the SGC liability. Generally, an employer can only use late contributions to offset a portion of the SGC that relates to the relevant employee. However, a late contribution cannot be used to offset the SGC in respect of a person who is no longer an employee.

Fixing a SG problem

If you are expecting leniency from the ATO for a first offence, think again. The Commissioner does not have any discretion at law to remit the SGC itself. The best a non-compliant employer can hope for is that the ATO may remit the 200% additional SGC penalty that applies for the late lodgment of a SGC statement.

Employers can also request the ATO to defer the due date for lodgment of a SGC statement. However, a deferral of time to lodge the statement does not defer the time for payment. The ATO will generally only extend the due date for payment where there are circumstances beyond the employer’s control (eg, a natural disaster or illness) and the payment can be made in full at a later time (or by instalments).

Do you think you could have a problem with your SG obligations? Speak to us about your options before the ATO is on your doorstep.